spacer
spacer search

BHE Security: Technical Surveillance Counter Measures
A weblog covering security and counter surveillance.

Search
spacer
Newsflash
Recent data indicates a significant decrease over the past few years in the interception of narcotics and the identification of fraudulent immigration documents, especially at airports.
 
header
Main Menu
Home
Services
CCTV
Hidden Video
Child Safety
Home Security
Link Exchange
Links
Contact Us
Security Store
 

Funding row over city centre CCTV
A row has broken out over who should foot the annual bill for CCTV in Norwich, council taxpayers or businesses. Government funding for the £250,000-a-year scheme is due to run out next month and Hereward Cooke, deputy leader of the Liberal-Democrat-run city council, thinks shops and firms should pay for it. But Home Secretary and Norwich South MP Charles Clarke insists the council must stump up the cash. Mr Clarke said: "The responsibility for proper local security including CCTV, alley-gating and community wardens is correctly a matter for local government." Mr Cooke said the cash for the network would have to come from the council – from council tax – but he would prefer it if businesses shared some of the burden. "Norfolk Constabulary funding was cut year-on-year and the city council now has to pay £250,000 a year. "This is the continuing saga of more and more public services that provide security being placed on local shoulders and on council tax payers." In Yarmouth, 110 local businesses help support its CCTV camera network through the Town Centre Partnership. "I would be interested to know how much the partnership is able to raise through that means," said Mr Cooke. "It's possible the Norwich economy is too different for this to work here as many of the companies in the city are national and even international. "I regret it utterly but it is very difficult for us to get money out of the major chains." In Yarmouth, the town's CCTV cameras are paid for by local businesses. According to Jonathan Newman, Yarmouth's town centre manager, there are 150 businesses which do not contribute, "but perhaps should". Steve Morphew, leader of the opposition Labour group on the city council, said: "It seems a bit late in the day to be raising this as an issue when the council have had so much time to do something about it before." Jim Wilson, chairman of Norfolk Police Authority, said the council had known for years about constabulary funding. He said: "CCTV systems all around the county and country are run with funding from local business people and grants. "I don't see why it should be any different here in Norwich." But local businesses disagreed. Paul Fisher, owner of Fine City Sound in St Gregory's Alley, said: "I would not be able to afford to help with the CCTV costs but even if I could, I am not sure that I would want to." Richard Stubbings, who owns Kulture Shock and The Lounge, in St Benedict's, said: "We pay a lot for our rates and get very little for it. CCTV is an excellent idea but money to fund it should be taken from our rates." Martin Webb, owner of Circular Sounds in St Benedict's, said: "It seems like the council is passing the buck on to businesses again. We are already paying a lot through our rates. I don't see why we businesses should foot the bill." Norwich's CCTV network includes 66 city centre cameras, 13 Norfolk County Council urban traffic control cameras and 12 car park cameras. from EDP24
 
spacer

 
© 2009 BHE Security: Technical Surveillance Counter Measures
spacer